After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. From lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to find the way these devices and to pursue their right for protection.

It also shows how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to view the stations of safeguard. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these technologies have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double impact: while they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.